Advocate Charu Mathur
Verified
4.5 |
5+ user ratings
Supreme Court of India, Delhi
21 years ExperiencePractice Areas
Civil, Consumer Court, Labour & Service, Landlord/Tenant, Supreme Court
About
Language(s) Spoken: English, Hindi
Advocate Charu Mathur has been practicing and handling cases independently with a result oriented approach, both professionally and ethically and has now acquired over 21 years of professional experience in providing legal consultancy and advisory services. Advocate Charu Mathur's office is in Supreme Court of India, Delhi.
Courts
- Appellate Tribunal For Electricity, Delhi,
- Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC),
- Delhi High Court,
- National Commission (NCDRC),
- National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT),
- National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi,
- National Green Tribunal (NGT),
- Supreme Court Of India
Recently Contacted Lawyers in Delhi
Advocate Sudershani Ray
4.6 | 100+ user ratings Kailash Hills, Delhi
14 years Experience
Advocate Wg Cdr Ajit Kakkar (Retd)
4.8 | 100+ user ratings Dwarka, Delhi
21 years Experience
Advocate Yuganshu Sharma
4.8 | 5+ user ratings Prashant Vihar, Delhi
4 years Experience
Advocate Kirti Dua
Panchsheel Enclave, Delhi
5 years Experience
Advocate Vijay Tangri
4.8 | 10+ user ratings Saket, Delhi
22 years Experience
Advocate Kapil Chandna
4.8 | 25+ user ratings Patiala House Court, Delhi
9 years Experience
Advocate Jaspreet Singh Rai
4.7 | 100+ user ratings Greater Kailash 1, Delhi
18 years Experience
Advocate Rajesh Rai
4.8 | 100+ user ratings Sector-19, Dwarka, Delhi
21 years Experience
Advocate Richaa Kapoor
4.6 | 50+ user ratings Delhi High Court, Delhi
29 years ExperienceTop Reviews
D
DEEPAK KUMAR SHARMA -
Verified Client
The lawyer was an expert in my legal issue. The lawyer gave me the right guidance. The lawyer helped me in taking the right decision going forward.
P
Prem -
Verified Client
The lawyer was an expert in my legal issue.
S
Shyamal Sunder Ghosh -
Verified Client
spoke to the lawyer on the case and provided details of the case including numbers and orders, after in depth ananlysis of the case details was informed I have to find some one closer home to handle the case ( the case details had location and stuff) and the listing carried details of case jusrisdictions. no specific guidance was provided , but the lawyers did go through the case and was able to ask specific details of the case the reason the rating is not bad.