Twisting the Prayer, quoting wrong issues and a wrong judgment

In a Judgement delivered by a Two Hon'ble Judges Bench, (i) Primary prayer of the petitioners has been replaced by an imaginary prayer by the Hon'ble Judges (ii)wrong and totally baseless statements are made by the Hon'ble Judges; (iii) imaginary and untrue statements are made by the Hon'ble Judges;(iv) Text of an earlier Parliamentary notification is quoted wrongly by adding a non existent word by the Hon'ble Judges; (v) a Statement in the judgment shows clear discrimination and sympathy to the respondents & As a result of all these, a simple petition, demanding a constitutional right by several thousands of Senior Citizens is dismissed by the Hon'ble Judges;. The Review Petition is also Dismissed by the same, Hon'ble Judges;(vi) Surprisingly this dismissal has given raise for an SLP in the Supreme Court, which is granting the petitioners, what was denied by an earlier notification. WHAT DO YOU SAY SIR?