654+ Lawyers are online 
File A Case U/s156(3) Crpc On July 2023 In Rohini Court .
31-May-2025 (In Criminal Law)
I file a application 156(3) on july 2023,final argument done by my lawyer on march 2024 .since orders delayed by court, can further proceed for promt justice
You will have to either mention the matter or move an application for expeditious disposal. You should also consider filling a monitoring application before magistrate once your FIR is registered. It helps in proper investigation of the matter.
Helpful?
Adv. Tejasv Anand
Delhi | 100+ Answers
CONTACT NOW
you can change ur advocate and appoint me , I am a renowned advocate in Rohini courts .
Use Online Grievance Portals (India-specific examples):
Police e-FIR systems: Available in many states for non-cognizable offenses.
Helpful?
Adv. Madhvi Chopra
Delhi | 50+ Answers
CONTACT NOW
you have to enquiry about the status of the order . whether it has been dictated by Hon'ble judge or not .you have to go to record room (record keeper ) Ahlmad room. and ask him about the status . you may also enquiry from readers. as your argument was completed in 2024 March then it is better to ask Ahlmad.
Helpful?
If your 156(3) application has been pending for order despite final arguments in March 2024, you may file an application for early hearing or mention the matter before the concerned judge citing the delay. If significant time has passed, you can also approach the High Court under Article 227 for expediting the matter in the interest of justice. Timely follow-up through your advocate is essential.
Helpful?
Adv. Apurva Singhal
Delhi | 25+ Answers
CONTACT NOW
As an expert criminal lawyer, delays in judicial pronouncements are unfortunately common, but not without recourse.
Given your Section 156(3) CrPC application was filed in July 2023 and final arguments concluded in March 2024, an unreasonable delay in pronouncement of orders can be challenged.
You can move the High Court under its supervisory jurisdiction (Article 227 of the Constitution) or inherent powers (Section 482 CrPC) for a direction to the lower court to pronounce the order expeditiously. The grounds would be that the delay is causing prejudice, defeating the ends of justice, and violating the principle of speedy trial. Provide the case details and the specific timeline of events to demonstrate the delay. While a specific timeframe for judgment isn't strictly defined, undue delay after final arguments is a valid ground for intervention.
Helpful?
Adv. Saurabh Sharma
Delhi | 25+ Answers
CONTACT NOW
Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.
Connect with top Criminal lawyers for your specific legal issue
No Comments! Be the first one to comment.
- Branch Manager Complaint: Police ne 19 Feb ko bayan ke liye bulaya
- Branch Manager Complaint: Police ne 19 Feb ko bayan ke liye bulaya
- Seeking Advice: Criminal Defamation Complaint Over Hotel Review
- Proving Entrustment u/s 406 and Cheating u/s 420 IPC
- FIR bns 80 (2) 85 61 or 115(2) dp act 3/4 k tahat hui h
"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."
