Advocate Arivazhagan

Questions Answered by Advocate Arivazhagan (25+ answers)

Q: Section 5 details and section 15

My wife filed sec9, sec15 in 2022. She claimed I going to marry sister-in-law Rajani in her petiton. I filed sec 13 1ia in 2022. Again she filed sec498A in highcourt in 2024. After contest I got divorce decree document in mar 2026. Now my parent plan to marry my sister-in-law Rajani in Feb 2027. Shall I get marry her now. What kind of legal issue may face again?

Advocate Arivazhagan answered
Yes, you can legally marry after February 2027, provided no appeal against your divorce decree is currently pending.Under Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act, a person is legally free to remarry once a divorce decree is granted and the limitation period for filing an appeal (90 days from the date of the decree) has expired without an appeal being filed. Since your decree was granted in March 2026, the standard 90-day window closed around June 2026.However, because your ex-wife previously alleged this specific relationship in her petitions, marrying Rajani introduces several critical legal risks and complications you must prepare for:

Q: How long time to take appeal for divorce case in hight court

How long time to take appeal for divorce case and file seat petition in court . The seat means what how to do this seat petition

Advocate Arivazhagan answered
The time limit for filing an appeal to the High Court against the divorce judgment of the Family Court is 30 days.• Commencement date: These 30 days are counted from the date the Family Court passes the final judgment or order.• Condonation of Delay: If the appeal cannot be filed within 30 days due to any reasonable or unavoidable reason (eg ill health), an application can be made to the court for condonation of delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963. However, the appeal will be considered only if the court accepts the reason for the delay.

Q: No financially support from husband

I am 33 years old, I have a kid of 9 years .I am a working women.My husband is not supporting financially. Please let me know whether I can file a case against him seeking for financial support?

Advocate Arivazhagan answered
A Maintenance Case (MC) filed by a wife, usually under Section 125 of the CrPC (now corresponding sections of BNS) or personal laws, seeks financial support from her husband. A wife is entitled to maintenance if she is unable to maintain herself, often receiving roughly 20–35% of the husband’s net income. Indian KanoonIndian Kanoon +4Key Aspects of MC Case (Wife):Eligibility: The wife must prove she cannot support herself and the husband has sufficient income but neglects her.Exceptions: Maintenance can be denied if the wife is living in adultery, refuses to live with her husband without a sufficient reason, or if they are living separately by mutual consent.Earning Wife: Even if a wife is working, she may still be entitled to maintenance if her income is not sufficient to maintain the standard of living she was accustomed to.Interim Maintenance: Courts can award interim maintenance and litigation costs to ensure the wife can survive during the pendency of the case.

Q: 3 Persons Sex Fight Sexual Torture Doing (About Sexual Part Big)

From My childhood to 3 persons name:ganesan,velliayan,big sexual part open in ayyanar kulam and 3 persons doing sex.before they are in rengasamy and jeyaraman and rengasamy brother land I went to bath there look around pumset.at the time ganesan and velliayan doing sex inside pumpset.uthirapathy(I went wash pumpset but he sex mental disorder make I went to physcology hospital to treatment) mahendhiran also sex me. my first standard in school.now they both telling to Village peoples ( hand sex I am doing) I am struggling from 38 years.please help me.i need sentence to them all please consider my complaint.

Advocate Arivazhagan answered
Sexual harassment case law in India is primarily governed by the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act), which mandates internal committees for workplaces with 10+ employees. Key precedents like Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan established initial guidelines, while recent rulings emphasize that the victim's experience of unwelcome behavior takes precedence over the offender's intent.

Q: Assault case - not proceed last 1.5 years

Some people was assaulted us and FIR filled against them in nilakkottai police station in May 2024. Now FIR filled in nilakkottai court. Now here problem is already two hearing over,but still summon not sending to the accused from police side.They have filled FIR and chargesheet to the court after raised multiple concerns in last 1.5 years to dsp office. Now again they are doing the same, not sending summon to accused. I don't know how to proceed next.I'm completely tired.

Advocate Arivazhagan answered
The Madras High Court noted that serving summons years after a case is filed is a lapse by both the police and the court registry.Successive FIRs: The Supreme Court has noted that registering successive FIRs after bail, just to keep a person in custody, is an abuse of the criminal process.Summoning Suspects: According to the Delhi High Court, if a person is in the