Legality of GHMC's Partial Demolition Despite Speaking Order
17-Jul-2026 (In Property Law)
GHMC issued a speaking order directing removal of the unauthorized compound wall after the encroacher failed to produce any valid documents and had no order from any competent court. However, GHMC demolished only a small portion, leaving most of the unauthorized wall intact. Was GHMC legally justified in carrying out only a partial demolition, or should it have removed the entire unauthorized structure?
If GHMC passed a speaking order directing removal of the entire unauthorized compound wall, and there was no stay order from any competent court, it was expected to implement the order in its entirety. Partial demolition, without any legal justification, may amount to incomplete compliance with its own order and failure to discharge its statutory duty. In such circumstances, the aggrieved party may seek implementation of the speaking order by submitting a representation or by approaching the High Court for appropriate directions to ensure complete removal of the unauthorized structure in accordance with law.
Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.
Connect with top Property lawyers for your specific legal issue
No Comments! Be the first one to comment.
"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."
629+ Lawyers are online
