LawRato

Cheating marriage harassment finical farud sexually harassing


06-May-2023 (In Criminal Law)
Are call recordings admissible as evidence in sessions, HC & SC? Mine are genuine (court can get them verified in forensic labs). But renowned advocates on YT say that call recordings, even after verification, do not ALWAYS serve as strong evidence.Should I do a sting operation on the accused? Is it legal & admissible? The accused was married before he met me. Recordings reflect that he hid his marital status.
Answers (4)

Answer #1
941 votes
hello mam as i can see your issue are really need to be taken care well. as a victim you need to take your case to court how can you decide tht a advocate who is clamming something on youtube will be working in you case . you need to immidiatelly take legal and proper action against the accused. do not worry all records you are having will be taken into evidence .
Helpful? LawRato LawRato
Advocate Vishwanath Pratap Singh

Adv. Vishwanath Pratap Singh

LawRato Delhi | 1000+ Answers
Chat with Advocate Vishwanath Pratap Singh Chat 
Answer #2
789 votes
call recording are admissible by courts but not as an primary evidence there are some benchmark and ground for secondary evidence if your recording is in video form so it's more reliable and aslo an strong evidence. if you need any legal advice or consultancy then batter call me.
Helpful? LawRato LawRato
Advocate Aman Saxena

Adv. Aman Saxena

LawRatoDelhi | 25+ Answers
Chat with Advocate Aman Saxena Chat 
Answer #3
846 votes
Call recording are not the sole criteria to convict a person but in today’s digital world it’s importance can’t be ignored by the court. If you have got any evidences regarding the person against whom you want to file a complaint then it’s advisable to attach it along with the affidavit. For more legal assistance I am just a call away.
Helpful? LawRato LawRato
Advocate Jitender Singh

Adv. Jitender Singh

LawRatoDelhi | 1000+ Answers
Chat with Advocate Jitender Singh Chat 
Answer #4
587 votes
The call recordings and video footage are primary evidence and are very much admissible in the court of Law. I'm afraid you have been wrongly advised so far. The motive is there, the proofs are there. Entering into sexual relationship on the pretext of marriage is sufficient to lodge an FIR against him under Sec. 376 IPC. You must also remember, a delay in FIR is fatal to the case of prosecution. If you require more details on that, you may consult me.
Helpful? LawRato LawRato
Advocate Puneet Srivastava

Adv. Puneet Srivastava

LawRatoDelhi | 700+ Answers
Chat with Advocate Puneet Srivastava Chat 

Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.

Report abuse?

Connect with top Criminal lawyers for your specific legal issue
Connect with a Lawyer
Comments by Users

No Comments! Be the first one to comment.

"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."

All Answers

Googling your legal issue online?

The internet is not a lawyer and neither are you.
Talk to a real lawyer about your legal issue.

LawRato