LawRato

defective notice in ni act what to do


04-Jul-2023 (In Cheque Bounce Law)
some has taken friendly loan from me 8 lakh.he has paid me 2 lakh. but he did not agree to reback balance amount. as a result there was huge arguments with him. at the end he has paid me 8 lakh rs cheque. But it was stopped payment. My lawyer has given legal notice demanding 6 lakh. The accused has replied and agreed to pay in installment. Now accused is saying its a defective notice so case should not continue. Now my lawyer does not getting any suitable court order for me.. pls help me. How and what should I do ?
Answers (3)

Answer #1
574 votes
Well, from your question it is clear that you are in touch with a lawyer. it is wise to direct consult with a lawyer in your case because the N.I Act cases are very technical in nature. Without gone through the concerned documents or evidences it is not possible to guide you properly. If you are not satisfied with your present lawyer you can easily contact with another competent lawyer for your help.

Answer #2
947 votes
if the notice is not fulfilling the requirement under section 138 (b) of the NT act, then the complaint filed by you is per se not maintainable in law. The Magistrate will fix a date for arguments on the point of defective legal notice and time barred corrigendum. There are many rulings where the entire proceedings been closed when the legal notice is found to be defective. There cannot be any pick and choose policy on this. However there is always an option for filing a civil suit for recovery of money. Then the genuineness of the transaction and claim shall be tested. If you need any assistance on this you may call me.

You can refer to Supreme Court Judgement: Civil Appeal No. 3238 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 10997 of 2008) Sh. Vishnu Dutt Sharma Vs. Respondent: Smt. Daya Sapra

"There cannot be any doubt or dispute that a creditor can maintain a civil and criminal proceeding at the same time. Both the proceeding, thus, can run parallely. The fact required to be proved for obtaining a decree in the civil suit and a judgment of conviction in the criminal proceedings may be overlapping but the standard of proof in a criminal case vis-a-vis a civil suit, indisputably is different. Whereas in a criminal case the prosecution is bound to prove the commission of the offence on the part of the accused beyond any reasonable doubt; in a civil suit `preponderance of probability' would serve the purpose for obtaining a decree."

Disclaimer: The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter.
Answer #3
847 votes
it is basically a defective notice if the same has been sent for seeking amount of Rs. 6 lakhs against the bounce cheque of Rs. 8 lakhs, however if you have filed any case against the said notice in the court then take the view of a good lawyer who can prove your case.

Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.

Report abuse?

Comments by Users

Ravi Kumar
Limitation to file complaint case under section 138 N I Act from corrigendum legal demand notice

Reply by LawRato
The limitation period for filing a demand notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1988 is 30 days from the date of receiving the notice of dishonour from the bank. This notice is typically the first demand notice sent by the payee or holder of the cheque to the drawer informing them of the dishonour and demanding payment. The drawer of the cheque has to make the payment within fifteen days from the date of receipt of such demand notice, failing which the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque can file a case under Section 138 of the NI Act against such drawer.

"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."