One of the best Advocates & Lawyers in Delhi - Advocate Ritesh Isaac

Advocate Ritesh Isaac

LawRato Verified
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato 3.8 | 50+ consults
Bengali Market, Delhi
16 years Experience
Practice Areas
Cheque Bounce, Consumer Court, Family, Property, Recovery, Banking / Finance
About
Language(s) Spoken: English, Hindi, Marathi
Advocate Ritesh Isaac started working with his father, Advocate Franklin Isaac, in Nagpur Labor and Industrial Court. He served his father, who has a standing practice of 20 years, and assisted him with Labor Laws, Departmental Inquires and represented Private companies namely Ballarpur Paper Mills. Therafter, he worked as a Senior Advocate in the Office of Advocate Ramesh Darda, who has a standing practice of 35 years in Nagpur High Court. As a senior advocate having 3 Junior Advocates in the office, Advocate Isaac has handled all cases relating to Civil / Criminal / Business / Commercial / Banking / Patent / Trade Mark / Copyright Cases under the SARFASI Act. The work also included appearance in the Nagpur and Mumbai High Court for appeals in Civil and Criminal matters. He takes cases for the Nagpur Region and appears in the High Court, District, Consumer Court, Labor Court, MAT, CAT, and DRT.

Advocate Isaac has also conducted cases under the Companies Act. He was also a part of the Liquidation Proceedings under Liquidation for the MEL. During this period he also conducted Conciliation and Arbitration Proceedings for WCL, MECL, MSEB, cases for Gratuity Act, Pension, Complaints under ID Act and MRTP Act were conducted by him. He also conducted Arbitration Proceedings for Banks. He was entrusted for Drafting Sale Deeds, Gift Deeds, Lease Deeds, Leave and License Agreements and all other deeds in respect to the property situated in Nagpur.

LAND MARK JUDGEMENT-

Advocate Isaac represented Bobcards Ltd in an Appeal filed by Smt Pushpa Sood vs. Bobcards Ltd.The Judgement that was passed by Justice B.P Dharamadhikari Nagpur High Court and was in favor of Bobcards ltd, and has been reported in the Maharashtra Law Journal 2005 Page 349. Apart from the Legal Practice he has been associated with a Collection Agency namely Swaraj Associates. The area of Collections was Nagpur, Amravati, Akola, and Raipur. He was the head for the collections Team for 30 Executives working under him. The Collections pertain to Credit Cards, Personal Loans, Home Loans and Car Loans. The Agency was on the panel of Bobcards Ltd, a subsidiary of the Bank of Baroda, GE Capital, SBI Credit cards, HDFC Credit Cards, DBS Cholamandalam, GE Money Financials, Bank of India and UCO Bank. He was entrusted to achieve the targets laid by the Banks for fresh cases, Bucket 1,2,3,4,5,and Write OFF. He achieved 85% of the resolution of the allocation given by the Banks.

He executed Agreements and MOU for Geotech India Ltd, Kores India Ltd for mining, drilling and oil leases. He also executed all the documentary legal work for the mining agreements with the Central Government. He is an honorary Legal member for the Western Coal India Limited, MOIL, Coal India Ltd. Presently, he is working as a Senior Advocate for Parekh and Company, New Delhi.

Advocate Ritesh enrolled with the Bar council of Maharashtra and Ga in 2003. He is a member of the High Court of Delhi, Supreme Court of India and Nagpur High Court Bar Association

Enrollment Number : MAH/935/2003
Courts
  • Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) Delhi,
  • Delhi High Court,
  • Supreme Court Of India
Book Consultation

Phone Consultation

30 Min Phone Consult
Rs. 1500

Meeting Consultation

1 Hour in-office meeting
Rs. 2200

Email Consultation

Legal advice by email
Rs. 2200

Get advice from Advocate Ritesh Isaac

Enter your name*
Enter your email
Enter your phone number*
Start describing your legal issue here*

Reviews (1)

K
Kulbhushan Rana - Verified Client LawRato LawRato LawRato
The lawyer could not help me with my issue. First of all i want to say that if they do not read my document then what they will tell.many times i had to tell him that iam plantiff not respondant.there is one more reason for not agreeing with him that the openion given by him on same issue is totally different then other experienced lawyer of lawratto,who has shared their views related to 138 and 420 in the website of lawrato.lets talk about your raiting system pl tell me how to rate when it does not know which one is higher and which one is lower.
Nov 16, 2017
Questions Answered by Advocate Ritesh Isaac Divorce procedure.How many ways its create problems for us? Need divorse or annulment from my newly marriage