Advocate Jasmeet Kaur Makkar

Questions Answered by Advocate Jasmeet Kaur Makkar (25+ answers)

Q: Career In Law..................

Can a Class 9 Fail Affect A Career In Law?............................ ......................

Advocate Jasmeet Kaur Makkar answered
No. Failing Class 9 does not affect a career in law. Because:- (A) Law eligibility depends on Class 12, not Class 9:- - For 5-year Law Courses (BA LL.B / BBA LL.B / B.Com LL.B) → you need to pass Class 12.- For 3-year LL.B → you need a graduation degree.- Class 9 marks or failure are never asked for in law admissions.(B) Entrance exams don’t consider Class 9CLAT, AILET, CUET, MH-CET Law, etc. only require: - Class 12 qualification (or appearing)- Minimum percentage as prescribed- Your school history in Class 9 is irrelevant.(C) Bar Council of India (BCI) has no concern with Class 9:- To become an advocate, the requirements are:- A recognized LL.B degree- Enrollment with a State Bar Council- There is no inquiry into school failures.(D) Law firms, courts & judges do not ask about Class 9:- Internships, chambers, law firms, litigation, judiciary exams - Focus on law degree, skills, internships, arguments. No one asks whether you failed Class 9. (E) Many successful lawyers have academic setbacks- Law values: Reasoning, Communication, Consistency, Court craft- One failure at school level has zero legal consequence.

Q: crucial case regarding alimony avoid

if mou is signed in women cell and same is filed in court for first and second motion but due to some circumstances the first motion got delayed 3 months new date got in 4th month can male client stop paying the first motion money by saying that there is a cohabitation between both parties but in reality nothing happens just male client want to delay and want to pay less alimony.. will there be any contempt from court or judge side ? if the female side say that we never met the male side is lyin

Advocate Jasmeet Kaur Makkar answered
No. The male client cannot stop paying the first-motion amount merely because the first motion was delayed or by falsely alleging cohabitation. If an MoU/settlement was signed in the Women Cell and filed before the court, its terms are binding on both parties. A delay of about 3 months in recording the first motion does not cancel or reduce the payment obligation, unless the MoU or a specific court order clearly states that payment is conditional on the original date. A mere allegation of cohabitation is not sufficient. The burden of proof lies on the male to establish that the parties actually resumed cohabitation. If the female side states on record that no meeting or cohabitation ever took place, and the male has no proof, the court will reject his claim and may view it as a delay tactic.Regarding contempt:- If payment of the first-motion amount is directed by the court, deliberate non-payment can amount to wilful disobedience, and the court may take a strict view, including costs or adverse orders.- If the amount is mentioned in the MoU but not yet ordered by the court, strict contempt may not apply, but the court can enforce the settlement and treat the male’s conduct as bad faith, which can affect further proceedings, including the second motion.If the male is found to be making false statements to delay or reduce alimony, the court can record adverse observations, reject his plea, and proceed on the basis of the settlement.