Advocate Aditya Kumar

Questions Answered by Advocate Aditya Kumar (25+ answers)

Q: Third parties inducted after preliminary decree in a partition suit

Preliminary decree was granted in a partition suit. After preliminary decree, some of the parties inducted multiple third parties as tenants many years ago, without consent of other parties and court. Eviction of tenants would normally take a long time. But my query now is since the preliminary decree was already granted before induction of tenants, can the tenants be evicted IN A SHORT TIME WITHOUT PROLONGED LITIGATION on the ground that the preliminary decree was already granted? Thank you.

Advocate Aditya Kumar answered
Yes, the position is broadly correct: a preliminary decree in a partition suit does not, by itself, authorize summary eviction of persons in possession, but a tenant inducted after institution of the suit or during the pendency of partition proceedings ordinarily takes subject to the result of the litigation under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 . In practice, this issue should be pressed before the final decree court; if the property is allotted to your share, you can then pursue delivery of possession in execution, while also accounting for any applicable rent-control or tenancy protections

Q: Legal notice issue want to do , any help needed u want contact me fast

I am a b tech graduate non lawyer i am getting many clients for matters loan settlement cheque bounce i do non litigation work for them . I want an advocate who can work in collaboration with me . Like for legal notice issue in his stamp , i can pay fees ,draft i will create , i want his legal stamp for notices .

Advocate Aditya Kumar answered
I can assist you in a wide range of legal matters with a practical, client-focused, and result-oriented approach. My services include legal consultation, drafting and vetting of agreements, contracts, notices, pleadings, petitions, affidavits, written submissions, legal opinions, and compliance-related documents

Q: Illegal termination case in labour court in Roase Avenue

Illegal terminal from Delhi State cooperative Bank ltd. Management of the bank which claimed that same case does not come under the jurisdiction of Central Government labour court So I have withdrawn the case from the court. Although case had been pending from last six year. I had to withdraw the case due to save waist of time Am I right or wrong in this regard

Advocate Aditya Kumar answered
You were not wrong to withdraw the case if the Central Government Labour Court did not have jurisdiction over the dispute. After six years of pendency, continuing in the wrong forum would likely have caused more delay and expense, so withdrawal was a practical decision. �That said, the important point is what you did next: if there is a proper forum available, the matter should be pursued there as soon as possible, keeping limitation and procedural requirements in mind. So, on the facts shown, your decision was reasonable and legally sensible.

Q: I got an old payment from a person in cheque

I got an old payment from a person in cheque And that person lives in West Bengal and now he doesn’t pick up my call and even blocked me on calls and WhatsApp now what should I do? His cheques bounced again I got three cheques from him now. What should I do? If if I file a case against him, then will I get my money back i have all the bounced cheque it. Cheque was bounced on 20 june 2026

Advocate Aditya Kumar answered
You should immediately send a written legal notice under Section 138 NI Act to his correct address within 30 days of the bank return memo, then wait 15 days for payment, and if he still does not pay, file a complaint within the next 30 days; his blocking you on calls or WhatsApp does not stop the case, and with the bounced cheques and bank memos you have the basic evidence needed, though recovery is not automatic and usually comes through settlement, court compensation, or execution after success in the case

Q: Illegal termination due to BGV verification and report not submitted

I have joined a company 2 months back . last week they told me that my BGV is negative and I have 7 days time to prove positive results . though after repeted mails, msgs and verbal communications company is failed to provide the BGV report and with in 24 hrs removed me from all professional grups and bloced my mail id and ph number . please advice

Advocate Aditya Kumar answered
You should immediately ask the company in writing for the full BGV report, the exact reason for the negative remark, and the basis or source of that report, because if they are acting on a vague or unfair verification without sharing details, you should be given a fair chance to explain and submit documents; you should also keep records of all emails, messages, and calls, reply only in writing, and share supporting papers like your offer letter, relieving letter, salary slips, PF records, ID proof, or experience letters if there is any mistake; if the company still refuses to share the report or continues to take adverse action, you should move to the next step by sending a legal notice or raising the matter through the company’s grievance process, as BGV is meant to verify facts and not to punish you unfairly.