IPC Section 179 - Refusing to answer public servant authorized to question
Last Updated: 01 Mar, 2025
By Advocate Chikirsha Mohanty
Please refer to BNS 214 for updated procedures & punishments.
IPC 179 in Simple Words
If someone who is required by law to tell the truth to a public servant refuses to answer their questions, they can be punished with up to six months in jail, a fine of up to one thousand rupees, or both.
Refusing to answer public servant authorized to question
Offence | Punishment | Cognizance | Bail | Triable |
---|---|---|---|---|
Being legally bound to state truth, and refusing to answer questions | Simple Imprisonment for 6 Months or Fine or Both | Non-Cognizable | Bailable | Same As Offence, subject to Ch. XXVI, or if not committed in a Court, Any Magistrate |
Offence : Being legally bound to state truth, and refusing to answer questions
Punishment : Simple Imprisonment for 6 Months or Fine or Both
Cognizance : Non-Cognizable
Bail : Bailable
Triable : Same As Offence, subject to Ch. XXVI, or if not committed in a Court, Any Magistrate
Explore the comprehensive list of all sections under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Our detailed guide provides a complete overview of each IPC Section to help you understand Indian law better.
Find the best lawyer for IPC Section 179 charges
Comments by Users
No Comments! Be the first one to comment.
Popular IPC Sections
Frequently Asked Questions
What is challan under section 179?
Ajit Kumar Sinha, Patna's S.P. (traffic), admits that the vehicle's registration is not given to the purchaser immediately after the purchase. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Patna's SP (traffic), admits that a vehicle's registration number is not given to the buyer immediately after he/she buys the vehicle.
Is Section 179 applicable in India?
Public companies are not covered by section 179 of Income Tax Act 1961. In India we have three categories of limited liability companies: private, public listed companies and closely held public limited company. 7 February 2019
What is Section 179 of the CRPC?
If an act is an offense because of something that has been done, or a consequence that has followed, it can be investigated or tried by the local court in whose jurisdiction this thing was done or consequence occurred.