SECTION 155 IPC - Indian Penal Code - Liability of person for whose benefit riot is committed
Last Updated: 01 Sep, 2024
By Advocate Chikirsha Mohanty
(Section is included as a sub-section in BNS sans heading.)
Please refer to BNS 193 for updated procedures & punishments.
IPC 155 in Simple Words
If a riot occurs for the benefit of a landowner or someone involved in a related dispute, that person can be fined if they or their agent/manager knew about the likelihood of the riot but failed to use lawful means to prevent or disperse it.
Cited by
Offence | Punishment | Cognizance | Bail | Triable |
---|---|---|---|---|
Person for whose benefit or on whose behalf a riot takes place not using all lawful means to prevent it | Fine | Non-Cognizable | Bailable | Any Magistrate |
Offence : Person for whose benefit or on whose behalf a riot takes place not using all lawful means to prevent it
Punishment : Fine
Cognizance : Non-Cognizable
Bail : Bailable
Triable : Any Magistrate
Looking for information on the Indian Penal Code? Check out our exhaustive list of all sections offering in-depth explanations and legal insights for each IPC Section.
Find the best lawyer for IPC Section 155 charges
Comments by Users
No Comments! Be the first one to comment.
Popular IPC Sections
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the meaning of section 155?
Section 155, however, allows the information about a non-cognizable crime to be recorded in a Special Register. This report is called a 'NCR (Non-cognizable Report)' and not a 'FIR.
What is the criminal procedure code 155?
A police officer may not investigate a case that is not cognizable without an order from a Magistrate who has the power to try the case or commit it for trial.
What is the 155 of CPC?
(1) If an officer is in charge of a station within the boundaries of the commission and receives information about a non-cognizable offense, he must enter or cause the entry of this information into a book that the State Government can prescribe.
What is Section 155 Clause 4?
The section 155(4) states that if a man is charged with rape, or attempting to ravish a woman, the prosecutor may have exhibited a generally immoral character.