Legal clarification

LEGAL CLARIFICATIONS 1. If a mandate holder (FATHER) issues cheques and bounce will that account holder (SON -NRI) held responsible in vicarious liability? 2. If the first cheque bounces for 3 times as insufficient funds and the mandate holder gives a subsequent cheque taking the first cheque back, also bounce as payment stopped by the drawer. Will this case comes under section 138 or 420? 3. If the account holder instruct the bank to cancel the mandate after months of issuing the cheque, then under which section the legal action can be taken? 4. Can an accused who is absconding since inception of the case in the lower court with repeated non bail able warrants (Evading Arrest) residing abroad approach high court seeking stay u/s 482 Crpc? 5. Can a person in a criminal case u/s 420 & 506 (b) for example C.C. No 1234/2009 Father is A1 (issues cheque as mandate holder) and son is A2 (NRE account holder), Since A2 was absconding since inception of the case the judge s