LawRato

Forgery notorized a document in India but actually was abroad


04-Jul-2023 (In Criminal Law)
Accused/seller has signed and notarized an 100 Rs stamped agreement to sale on 10.oct.2020 and sent it to buyer and later forfeited the token amount paid via a letter through his wife but accused was actually abroad on that date of notarization and forfeiture. All facts admitted in High Court by accused.nnFIR u/s 420/406 is under trial. nnWill accused be charged for 467, 468 , 471 or any other IPC ? nnIs conviction confirm if above facts have been admitted by accused via affidavits in court ?
Answers (1)

Answer #1
791 votes
the averments made by you ex facie reveal that there has been serious discrepancies however there are facts and figures which turn out to be inaccurate and a bit inexplicable as well...what I could decipher is a plethora of forgery section hav been imposed upon you. To give me an exact pictures as to what is this scenario you make contact me
Helpful? LawRato LawRato

Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.

Report abuse?

Comments by Users

No Comments! Be the first one to comment.

"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."