85+ Lawyers are online 
Request for Reconsideration of Pension Eligibility under MHADA Act
11-May-2025 (In Civil Law)
The Petitioner filed a Writ Petition to claim pension benefits, arguing that they should be eligible under the MHADA Act. However, the Court ruled that since the Petitioner was not a permanent employee of the Bombay Board when it became part of MHADA, they were not entitled to pension. Instead, the Petitioner received benefits under the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) Scheme. As a result, the Court dismissed the Petition, stating no pension entitlement under the law.
Well, if you are not satisfied with the Order passed by the Honourable Court, you can file an Appeal before the concerned Appellate forum within 30 Days from the Date of the passing of Order or in consonance of within the period mentioned under the Limitation Act, 1963 for filing Appeal.
Helpful?
Adv. Pankaj Bajaj
Mumbai | 1000+ Answers
Chat
Well, if you are not satisfied with the decision of the concerned High Court in Writ Petition listed before it, then, you can challenge such decision before the Supreme Court of India by filing a SLP.
Helpful?
Adv. Pankaj Bajaj
Pune | 700+ Answers
Chat
Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.
Connect with top Civil lawyers for your specific legal issue
No Comments! Be the first one to comment.
"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."
