2+ Lawyers are online
Regarding Regularization Policy 2014
22-Sep-2026 (In Civil Law)
I am posted as a Data Entry Operator in HVPNL through Hartron Workstation Gurugram in a Government Department. However, the department did not regularise my services according to the 2014 regularisation policy. The department states that they had filed a case in the High Court, the decision for which came in May 2026. In its decision, the Court wrote - Needless to say, if case of the petitioners is considered favourably, they would be entitled to the same relief as has been extended to the pe
Obtain a certified copy of the High Court's May 2026 judgment and identify the exact relief granted to the petitioners.
File a detailed representation before the concerned department/HVPNL, citing the judgment and requesting extension of the same relief to similarly placed employees like yourself, under the 2014 regularisation policy.
If the department rejects or fails to respond within a reasonable time (usually 8-12 weeks), you may file a separate writ petition before the High Court seeking a direction to extend the same benefit, relying on the earlier judgment as a precedent.
Helpful?
Adv. Neha Gupta
Adv. Neha Gupta
Kurukshetra | 100+ Answers
Chat
The issue appears to involve the applicability of the 2014 regularisation policy and the effect of the judgment referred to by you. The exact legal position would depend upon the facts of your appointment, nature and continuity of service, applicable policy conditions, and the judgment in question.
Helpful?
Adv. Sanrit Lala
Adv. Sanrit Lala
Gurgaon / Gurugram | 5+ Answers
Chat
On the facts stated, the first step should be to obtain and examine the complete judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court in May 2026, particularly the exact relief granted to the similarly situated petitioners and the meaning of the observation that if the petitioners case is considered favourably they would be entitled to the same relief extended to the concerned employees. Since the 2014 Haryana Regularisation Policy was applicable to Group C/D contractual employees and was circulated to Corporations the employee should submit a detailed representation to the competent authority claiming consideration under the policy demonstrating that he satisfies all eligibility conditions and is similarly situated to the beneficiaries of the Court’s order. If the representation is rejected or not decided within a reasonable period an appropriate writ petition under Article 226 may be considered before the Punjab & Haryana High Court seeking quashing of the adverse decision and a direction for regularisation in accordance with the applicable policy and the May 2026 judgment.
Helpful?
Adv. Deepak Sangwaan
Adv. Deepak Sangwaan
Bahadurgarh | 5+ Answers
Chat
You should submit a detailed representation to the Managing Director, HVPNL, seeking regularisation under the 2014 policy and requesting a reasoned order.
However, regularisation is not automatic. Your eligibility will depend on your length of service, appointment records, qualifications and compliance with the applicable policy conditions.
If the department rejects your claim without properly considering the applicable law, you may explore further legal remedies before the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
Helpful?
Adv. Bhavik Ranjit Samani
Adv. Bhavik Ranjit Samani
Gurgaon / Gurugram | 5+ Answers
Chat
Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way
whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the
query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to
address the specific facts and details.
Connect with top
Civil lawyers for your
specific legal issue
No Comments! Be the first one to comment.
"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."
