Advocate Mukim Ahmed

Questions Answered by Advocate Mukim Ahmed

Q: Police Clearance Certificate for immigration and I have one case at as

Hello Sir,I need guidance regarding my Police Clearance Certificate (PCC). A few years ago, an FIR was registered against me at, Amritsar. The case has already been disposed by the court with the result “Contested Dismissed.”Now I am applying for an overseas PCC, and I want to know: 1. Will this disposed case appear on my PCC? 2. If it appears, will it show only as “Disposed / Dismissed,” or will it be considered adverse? 3. Is it possible that the case does not show on PCC aft

Advocate Mukim Ahmed answered
Dear Client, your disposed ‘Contested Dismissed’ FIR from Amritsar will likely appear on the PCC as ‘disposed/dismissed’ (non-adverse), but apply via Passport Seva with court order copy for verification. It won’t block visas if disclosed transparently. Share FIR/court details for affidavit drafting.

Q: My case is already present in high court punjab & Haryana I am apply a

My case is already present in high court punjab & Haryana I am apply antispetary bail, police Registered FIR against me , session dismissed my bail, complaintant says I have given 27 lakh cash to me , no any legal document or aggreement signed by me , no any type of bank transaction, No any cheque , police charged 420 or 13TPT agent act, complaint only show land records from where money comes such as there land sales deeds, what happens now, court give me bail or not, kindly give suggestions sir

Advocate Mukim Ahmed answered
no recovery memo, bank trails, or witnesses to transaction,arguing investigation can proceed without custody per Supreme Court guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. Recommend attaching precedents like Punjab & Haryana HC grants in similar IPC 420/PC Act cases lacking documents.

Q: 01:00 Vo LTE 4G+ 161 PBAS010076032024_11_2... Ramesh Chandra Vs.

11.11.2025.vide which the learned court dismissed the complaint without summoning the accused.Present:Sh. Samardeep Singh, Adv. counsel for revisionist.Sh. Saurabh Nanda, Adv. counsel for respondents no.1 and 2.Respondent no.3 is reported to have died.Sh. Gursher Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent no.4.None for respondent no.5.Service of respondent no.6 is dispensed with.JUDGMENT:1)

Advocate Mukim Ahmed answered
likely an accused in the original complaint, your appearance is confirmed. Prepare to oppose the revision, arguing the trial court’s dismissal was proper due to lack of prima facie case under Section 203 CrPC, no grounds for summoning under Section 204 CrPC, and no perversity in the impugned order warranting interference under Sections 397/401 CrPC.