LawRato

Latest Ruling Territorial Jurisdiction for Cheque Bounce Matters ( NI Section 138)

August 18, 2026

Table of Contents
  1. Why do you need a lawyer for a cheque bounce case?

In the case of a Dishonour of Cheque, one can send a legal notice and follow the legal procedure in order to get the cheque honoured in the Court of appropriate jurisdiction. For this, you will need the help of a cheque bounce lawyer. The Gujarat High Court in its recent judgment of Brijendra Enterprise v. State of Gujarat and another has explained the law relating to territorial jurisdiction for filing a complaint about the dishonor of cheques. As per the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2015 a complaint can be filed under Section 138 for the dishonor of cheque at a court within whose local jurisdiction:-

  • The branch of the bank is located

  • The payee or the holder maintains an account

In view of this recent amendment, a complaint for dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act can be filed in the court situated at a place where the bank of the payee is situated. For better understanding, consider the following examples-

  1. Mr. A holds an account in Navrangpura Branch, Ahmedabad of “XYZ” Bank, issues a cheque payable in favor of B. B, who holds an account with the M.S University Road Branch, Vadodara of the “PQR” bank, deposits the said cheque at Surat Branch of 'PQR bank' and the cheque is dishonored. The complaint will have to be filed before the court having jurisdiction where the M.S University road branch is situated.

  2. A holds an account with the Navrangpura branch, Ahmedabad, of "XYZ" Bank issues a cheque payable in favor of B. B presents the cheque at the Vadodara Branch of the 'XYZ' Bank ( but B does not hold an account in any branch of the "XYZ" bank) and the cheque is dishonored. The complaint will have to be filed before the court having jurisdiction over the Navrangpura branch, Ahmedabad, of "XYZ" Bank.

To summarise, when the cheque is delivered for collection through an account, the complaint is to be filed before the court where the branch of the bank is located, where the payee or the holder in due course maintains his account and, when the cheque is presented for payment over the bank, the complaint is to be filed before the court where the drawer maintains his account.
 

Why do you need a lawyer for a cheque bounce case?

Cheque bounce can attract possible criminal charges. By hiring a cheque bounce lawyer to file or to defend a cheque bounce case is one way you can ensure that you are on the right path in your cheque bounce journey. While the lawyer will need to gather information from you regarding the case, he or she will also take care of all the paperwork, allowing you more time to take care of your business and other priorities. An experienced attorney can give you expert advice on how to handle your cheque bounce case owing to his years of experience in handling such cases. A cheque bounce lawyer is an expert on the laws and can help you avoid significant mistakes that may cause financial or legal harm, which may require future legal proceedings to correct. A lawyer would also ensure you are directed on the right path regarding which kind of case to opt for. Thus, by hiring an attorney a person can make sure that he and his interests are protected under the law. You can also use LawRato's Free Legal Advice service to get free advice on your legal issue from expert cheque bounce lawyers.

 


These guides are not legal advice, nor a substitute for a lawyer
These articles are provided freely as general guides. While we do our best to make sure these guides are helpful, we do not give any guarantee that they are accurate or appropriate to your situation, or take any responsibility for any loss their use might cause you. Do not rely on information provided here without seeking experienced legal advice first. If in doubt, please always consult a lawyer.

Connect with top Cheque Bounce lawyers for your specific issue

Comments by Users


Adity
What about the rules set in bhaskaran case regarding jurisdiction

Reply by LawRato
Bhaskaran case calls for a stricter interpretation of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NIA) precisely because of its misemployment so far as choice of place of suing is concerned. The Court, in Bhaskaran Case had held that the jurisdiction to try an offence under Section 138 NIA could not be determined only by reference to the place where the cheque was dishonoured as the dishonour of the cheque was not by itself an offence under Section 138 NIA and that the offence was completed only when the drawer failed to pay the cheque amount within the period of fifteen days stipulated under clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138 of the Act and held that any court within whose jurisdiction any of the above acts were committed had jurisdiction.

Popular Cheque Bounce Lawyers


Advocate Ravi Sharma
Gomti Nagar, Lucknow
11 years Experience
Advocate Surangama Sharma
Gomti Nagar, Lucknow
11 years Experience
Advocate Bharat Dixit
High Court, Lucknow
16 years Experience
Advocate Ankit Dubey
Gomati Nagar, Lucknow
3 years Experience

Frequently Asked Questions


How does the new law on territorial jurisdiction impact the filing process for cheque bounce cases in India?

The new law mandates that cheque bounce cases must be filed in the court where the bank branch of the payee is located, rather than where the cheque was presented or dishonored. This change aims to streamline the legal process and reduce the burden on payees by centralizing jurisdiction.


What are the implications of the new territorial jurisdiction law on the choice of court for initiating cheque bounce proceedings in India?

The new territorial jurisdiction law mandates that cheque bounce proceedings must be initiated in the court where the bank branch of the payee is located, rather than where the cheque was presented or dishonored, streamlining the legal process and reducing jurisdictional conflicts.


What changes have been introduced in the territorial jurisdiction for cheque bounce cases, and how do they affect the legal strategy for plaintiffs in India?

The territorial jurisdiction for cheque bounce cases in India now lies where the cheque is presented for payment, not where it was issued. This change allows plaintiffs to file cases in their own location, potentially reducing travel and legal costs, and influencing strategic decisions on where to initiate legal proceedings.


How does the revised territorial jurisdiction law influence the timeline and procedural requirements for cheque bounce litigation in India?

The revised territorial jurisdiction law mandates that cheque bounce cases be filed where the payee's bank is located, streamlining the process and potentially reducing delays. This change aims to simplify procedural requirements, ensuring quicker resolution by centralizing jurisdiction and minimizing logistical hurdles.


What are the potential challenges faced by defendants due to the changes in territorial jurisdiction for cheque bounce cases in India?

Defendants may face logistical challenges, increased legal costs, and potential delays due to the need to travel to the complainant's location, as cheque bounce cases are now filed where the payee's bank is located. This can lead to difficulties in gathering evidence and coordinating legal representation.


User Reviews


LawRato LawRato LawRato LawRato LawRato 4.5 - 21 reviews
U
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

Easy to understand. All details covered regarding cheque bounce.

Uday on Oct 28, 2026
S
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

can I file civil and criminal case both in cheque bounce?

Sunil on Oct 20, 2026
A
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

thanks for the details. Very helpful for my cheque bounce case.

Ankit on Oct 09, 2026
R
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

Cheque given as security for loan? What to do?

Rohan on Nov 04, 2026
N
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

I want to hire a cheque bounce advocate. Who to call?

Nagesh on Oct 04, 2026
R
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

Written in a very simple language.

Rajan on Oct 25, 2026
V
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

learned all the basics about the legal issue. Good article. Keep it up.

Vishal on Nov 02, 2026
T
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

Detailed and informative.

Tarun on Oct 28, 2026
A
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

nice work with the article.

Amandeep on Oct 26, 2026
M
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

it’s a very nice legal article

Manisha on Oct 19, 2026
P
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

needed some more information on the subject.

Priti on Oct 24, 2026
M
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

informative

Murali on Oct 22, 2026
H
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

good work. Keep it up

Harish on Oct 08, 2026
J
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

very helpful

Jyoti on Sep 21, 2026
S
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

solved my queries.

Shivam on Oct 30, 2026
M
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

very good article. Please provide more information on the subject

Mandeep on Oct 03, 2026
S
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

Had a good time reading the article.

Sudhir on Oct 24, 2026
P
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

very good article. Good writing

Preeti on Oct 19, 2026
S
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

Very helpful in understanding the law.

Sneha on Oct 30, 2026
S
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

very well written

Sunitha on Oct 04, 2026
M
LawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRatoLawRato

Helped a lot in understanding the law.

Monica on Sep 28, 2026

VIEW ALL