Can i claim the property purchased in Wife's name during divorce ?
07-Dec-2023 (In Divorce Law)
I purchased some property in the name of my wife before we devorsed , She also filed a defamation case on me ( THE COURT DISMISSED THAT CASE ) , While the honarable posecuter examining her she accepted that " MY HUSBAND PURCHASED SOME PROPERTY IN MY NAME ". Is there any possibility to get my property 100 % back in my name as per the benami act..??
More than 20 years after a Ratnagiri couple got divorced, the Bombay high court has given the man the right to claim the property he had bought for his former wife in happier times.
“The husband had purchased the property in the name of his wife with his own money and, therefore, she was only [the] benamidar, or the ostensible owner, while the husband is the real owner,” justice JH Bhatia observed in his order last week. Since the husband bought the house in 1981, the transaction was not barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, which came into existence in 1988.
Family court advocate Kranti Sathe said the ruling would affect many couples who buy property jointly. “The court has tried to strike a balance — the wife is entitled to maintenance after divorce, but even the husband has not been denied the property that he purchased with his hard-earned money,” Sathe said.
This means if a spouse cannot prove to have bought the property with his or her own money, he or she may lose the right to claim it, Sathe said.
In this case, Jayant and Sonali (names changed) were married in 1979. In January 1981, Jayant said he bought the property worth Rs5,000 in Ratnagiri in Sonali’s name out of “love and affection”. He said he had paid for it after securing a bank loan of Rs1,500 and using savings from his salary, which was Rs350 per month at the time.
In 1984, after their relationship soured, Sonali moved out of Jayant’s home and started living separately with her parents in Kolhapur. In 1993, the trial court held that Jayant had paid for the property and it was not bought for the benefit of his wife.
Sonali challenged the decision before the high court, claiming she had paid for the property from the money her “rich” father had given her and the scholarship she earned as a student of biochemistry.
Justice Bhatia, however, observed that there is “no material to show” that Sonali had received “any funds, either from her father or any scholarship”, to purchase the property.
The court said it was “logical and reasonable” for Jayant to buy the property in Sonali’s name when they were married and living cordially. But after their separation, when Jayant’s first claim was allowed by the court in 1989, Sonali made no attempt to claim the property.
The court dismissed Sonali’s appeal and permitted Jayant to claim the property that was rightfully his.
Neelofar Akhtar, member of the family court bar association, said the ruling assumes importance as there are not enough provisions in law to deal with property disputes arising out of divorces.
“The woman has the right to alimony after divorce but if she claims property also, what remains with the man?” said Akhtar.
Family court lawyer Kranti Sathe said sometimes men may buy property in the wife’s name for tax benefits and sometimes women may end marriages too soon to get a “back-door claim” to the man’s property.
Sathe said the length of marriage is also crucial while deciding such cases.
But divorce cases are very delicate and tricky as they differ from couple to couple and it is difficult to apply anything as a blanket rule, Sathe added.
“The husband had purchased the property in the name of his wife with his own money and, therefore, she was only [the] benamidar, or the ostensible owner, while the husband is the real owner,” justice JH Bhatia observed in his order last week. Since the husband bought the house in 1981, the transaction was not barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, which came into existence in 1988.
Family court advocate Kranti Sathe said the ruling would affect many couples who buy property jointly. “The court has tried to strike a balance — the wife is entitled to maintenance after divorce, but even the husband has not been denied the property that he purchased with his hard-earned money,” Sathe said.
This means if a spouse cannot prove to have bought the property with his or her own money, he or she may lose the right to claim it, Sathe said.
In this case, Jayant and Sonali (names changed) were married in 1979. In January 1981, Jayant said he bought the property worth Rs5,000 in Ratnagiri in Sonali’s name out of “love and affection”. He said he had paid for it after securing a bank loan of Rs1,500 and using savings from his salary, which was Rs350 per month at the time.
In 1984, after their relationship soured, Sonali moved out of Jayant’s home and started living separately with her parents in Kolhapur. In 1993, the trial court held that Jayant had paid for the property and it was not bought for the benefit of his wife.
Sonali challenged the decision before the high court, claiming she had paid for the property from the money her “rich” father had given her and the scholarship she earned as a student of biochemistry.
Justice Bhatia, however, observed that there is “no material to show” that Sonali had received “any funds, either from her father or any scholarship”, to purchase the property.
The court said it was “logical and reasonable” for Jayant to buy the property in Sonali’s name when they were married and living cordially. But after their separation, when Jayant’s first claim was allowed by the court in 1989, Sonali made no attempt to claim the property.
The court dismissed Sonali’s appeal and permitted Jayant to claim the property that was rightfully his.
Neelofar Akhtar, member of the family court bar association, said the ruling assumes importance as there are not enough provisions in law to deal with property disputes arising out of divorces.
“The woman has the right to alimony after divorce but if she claims property also, what remains with the man?” said Akhtar.
Family court lawyer Kranti Sathe said sometimes men may buy property in the wife’s name for tax benefits and sometimes women may end marriages too soon to get a “back-door claim” to the man’s property.
Sathe said the length of marriage is also crucial while deciding such cases.
But divorce cases are very delicate and tricky as they differ from couple to couple and it is difficult to apply anything as a blanket rule, Sathe added.
What is the succession of female property in Hinduism?
The Hindu Succession Amendment Act of 2005, made the daughter a co-parent in a joint household, just like the son. The amendment ensured that both women and men would be equal beneficiaries of ancestral properties. All property will be passed on to children and husbands. 15-Feb-2023
Can a husband claim his wife's property after her death?
During the lifetime of the wife, the husband does not have any rights over her property. When the wife dies, her share is divided between her husband and her children. Devajyoti Barman, a Kolkata-based lawyer, says that if the wife receives her share during her lifetime, then the husband will inherit it. 26-Oct-2023
Who are the legal heirs in Hindu law?
What are the legal heirs under Hindu law?
Who is legal heir of Hindu married man?
According to the Hindu Succession Act of 2005, the legal heirs of a deceased Hindu man or wife include other legal successors that are Class I heirs. These are the types of property: Self-acquired Property: The wife inherits as the legal heir to the deceased husband.
Hi
Wife is NOT a benami for the husband
Any property in the name of a woman is her absolute property.
So even if all of the money has been paid by you, but you have registered the property in your wife's name. you can do NOTHING about it unless and until your wife voluntarily executes a relinquishment deed in your favour
Wife is NOT a benami for the husband
Any property in the name of a woman is her absolute property.
So even if all of the money has been paid by you, but you have registered the property in your wife's name. you can do NOTHING about it unless and until your wife voluntarily executes a relinquishment deed in your favour
Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.
Connect with top Divorce lawyers for your specific legal issue
No Comments! Be the first one to comment.
"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."