LawRato

in a cc case 319 crpc detailed answer required interested only answer


27-Jun-2026 (In Criminal Law)
in ongoing 319 hearing, respondent are now claiming that they did not receive the revised petition. However, they have already filed a detailed counter addressing the contents of the petition. The Court docket dated 18.06.2026 records that the petitioner side was heard and the respondent side was heard in part. In these circumstances, does the respondents' present stand appear false and intended only to delay the proceedings and divert attention from the merits? .. how to respond to this court
Answers (2)

Answer #1
1000 votes
The respondent's claim of non-receipt appears inconsistent with the filing of a detailed counter-affidavit, which explicitly addresses the contents of the revised petition. The court docket records showing the respondent was heard in part suggest active participation, contradicting the assertion that they were unaware of the petition's specifics. To respond, you should file a reply highlighting these contradictions in the court records to demonstrate that the claim is likely a delaying tactic rather than a genuine procedural grievance.
Helpful? LawRato LawRato
Answer #2
892 votes
If the respondent claims they did not receive the revised petition but has already filed a detailed counter, this is a common delaying tactic. Courts generally view this as an attempt to divert attention from the merits of the Section 319 CrPC application
Helpful? LawRato LawRato

Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.

Report abuse?

Comments by Users

No Comments! Be the first one to comment.

"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."