Husband raised charges under section 226, 227 and 482 against me
07-Jan-2023 (In Criminal Law)
I wanted to know about above 3 charges (226, 227, 482) which my husband raised on me. please let me know what is this charges exactly and how to proceed further.
[Repealed.]
226. [Unlawful return from transportation.] Rep. by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1955 (26 of 1955), s. 117 and Sch.
Violation of condition of remission of punishment.
227. Violation of condition of remission of punishment.-- Whoever, having accepted any conditional remission of punishment, knowingly violates any condition on which such remission was granted, shall be punished with the punishment to which he was originally sentenced, if he has already suffered no part of that punishment, and if he has suffered any part of that punishment, then with so much of that punishment as he has not already suffered.
Punishment for using a false property mark.
482. Punishment for using a false property mark.-- Whoever uses [1] any false property mark shall, unless he proves that he acted without intent to defraud, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
-----
1. Ss. 147 to 489 were subs. by Act 4 of 1889, for the original sections.
Pls tell exactly story otherwise I can't help
226. [Unlawful return from transportation.] Rep. by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1955 (26 of 1955), s. 117 and Sch.
Violation of condition of remission of punishment.
227. Violation of condition of remission of punishment.-- Whoever, having accepted any conditional remission of punishment, knowingly violates any condition on which such remission was granted, shall be punished with the punishment to which he was originally sentenced, if he has already suffered no part of that punishment, and if he has suffered any part of that punishment, then with so much of that punishment as he has not already suffered.
Punishment for using a false property mark.
482. Punishment for using a false property mark.-- Whoever uses [1] any false property mark shall, unless he proves that he acted without intent to defraud, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
-----
1. Ss. 147 to 489 were subs. by Act 4 of 1889, for the original sections.
Pls tell exactly story otherwise I can't help
Helpful?
21+
Please elaborate and put more light in this matter about which Act the sections 226 227 and 482 are charged. And where the case has been filed. As far as IPC 1860 is concerned 226 is repealed 227 and 482 I don't see being charhed on you.
Helpful?
13+
Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.
Connect with top Criminal lawyers for your specific legal issue
No Comments! Be the first one to comment.
"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."