In the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), Section 354 and Section 354A both deal with sexual offences against women. However, there are some differences between Section 354 IPC and 354A IPC; these are as follows:-
IPC Section 354 pertains to the offence of assaulting or using criminal force on a woman with an intention to outrage her modesty or knowing that such an act is likely to outrage her modesty. The criminal intention or knowledge on the part of the accused is the crux of the offence under this section. This section criminalizes a wide range of acts such as making physical contact with sexual intent without the woman's consent, like molesting her, pulling up the veil of a purdanashin woman. When a man pulls a woman towards himself and while removing her saree, gushes in with a request for sexual intercourse, intending thereby to outrage her modesty. He has committed an offence under Section 354, IPC.
It is punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to five years, and with fine.
The offence under Section 354 is a non-bailable offence.
IPC Section 354A pertains to the offence of sexual harassment. Sexual harassment may be committed in any of the following ways:
- making unwanted sexual advances or any physical contact that is unwelcome and sexually motivated,
- demanding or requesting sexual favours,
- showing pornography against a woman's will,
the above 3 acts are punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
- making sexually explicit remarks in the presence of a woman.
the above act is punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term that may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
In this case, unlike Section 354, the act of the accused need not necessarily be physical; it does not require the use of any force or assualt on a woman so as to outrage her modesty. It can be subtle yet equally harassing to her sexual self. Also, there is no requirement of proving criminal intention or knowledge on the part of the accused; the criminal act of sexual harassment is enough. Whereas, in Section 354 IPC, criminal intention or knowledge to outrage modesty is essential to affix liability on the accused.
The offence under Section 354A is a bailable offence.
Therefore, while both IPC Section 354 and IPC Section 354A address offences of a sexual nature, they differ in terms of the specific actions that are considered criminal, as well as the language and intent of the sections.
354 has an element of force in it. so to molest someone there's this physical force involved.
354A need not have any physical force involved and yet may harass anyone sexually mostly woman.
regards,
Tanmoy Chattopadhyay,
M.Sc (Net), LL.B (Delhi),
Advocate,
High Court, Calcutta.
Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way
whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the
query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to
address the specific facts and details.