LawRato

cc case 319 crpc detailed answer required interested answer


27-Jun-2026 (In Criminal Law)
in ongoing 319 hearing, respondent are now claiming that they did not receive the revised petition. However, they have already filed a detailed counter addressing the contents of the petition. The Court docket dated 18.06.2026 records that the petitioner side was heard and the respondent side was heard in part. In these circumstances, does the respondents' present stand appear false and intended only to delay the proceedings and divert attention from the merits? .. how to respond to this court
Answers (1)

Answer #1
920 votes
As the respondent has already filed a detailed counter of the revised petition it indicates that they had full knowledge of it. And the order dated 18. 06. 2026 further proves that the proceedings was heard on merit and hence now he cannot state that the revised petition was never received. Thus, Respondent is restricted by the principle of estoppel and has to stand by his action, you can tell the court that they hav already you replied and now if they are taking this defence its bad in law point out to it in roznama and get it sorted and run the case trial Further
Helpful? LawRato LawRato
Advocate Moksh Jain

Adv. Moksh Jain

LawRato Mumbai | 100+ Answers
Chat with Advocate Moksh Jain Chat 

Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.

Report abuse?

Connect with top Criminal lawyers for your specific legal issue
Connect with a Lawyer
Comments by Users

No Comments! Be the first one to comment.

"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."

All Answers

Googling your legal issue online?

The internet is not a lawyer and neither are you.
Talk to a real lawyer about your legal issue.

LawRato