LawRato

01:00 Vo LTE 4G+ 161 PBAS010076032024_11_2... Ramesh Chandra Vs.


28-Nov-2025 (In Criminal Law)
11.11.2025. vide which the learned court dismissed the complaint without summoning the accused. Present: Sh. Samardeep Singh, Adv. counsel for revisionist. Sh. Saurabh Nanda, Adv. counsel for respondents no.1 and 2. Respondent no.3 is reported to have died. Sh. Gursher Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent no.4. None for respondent no.5. Service of respondent no.6 is dispensed with. JUDGMENT: 1)
Answers (1)

Answer #1
868 votes
likely an accused in the original complaint, your appearance is confirmed. Prepare to oppose the revision, arguing the trial court’s dismissal was proper due to lack of prima facie case under Section 203 CrPC, no grounds for summoning under Section 204 CrPC, and no perversity in the impugned order warranting interference under Sections 397/401 CrPC.
Helpful? LawRato LawRato
Advocate Mukim Ahmed

Adv. Mukim Ahmed

LawRato Mohali | 25+ Answers
Chat with Advocate Mukim Ahmed Chat 

Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.

Report abuse?

Connect with top Criminal lawyers for your specific legal issue
Connect with a Lawyer
Comments by Users

No Comments! Be the first one to comment.

"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."

All Answers

Googling your legal issue online?

The internet is not a lawyer and neither are you.
Talk to a real lawyer about your legal issue.

LawRato