LawRato

The king of good time flees India, pockets 40 million dollars

March 09, 2016


The King of Good Times and once considered India's Richard Branson is once again in the newspapers and once again for the wrong reasons. The liquor baron, who once owned Kingfishers Airlines, is in the news for fleeing India after not willing to pay up the loans he has in his name. According to reports, he owns 9000 crore rupees borrowed over the span of a few years to a consortium of 17 banks in India.

The reluctance of Mallya to pay up the loans was known to many in the business field. Way back in 2010, when the second round of loan procurement was raised for Kingfisher Airlines, the banking sector were split in opinions on whether to provide a loan to Mallya for reviving the Airlines. On one hand, many state-owned banks were in the favor of lending the money as they saw the opportunity to redesign the business model of Kingfisher's and its operations. Being the optimists that bankers were at that point of time, the money was lent to Mallya albeit at decent interest rates. The problem soon started to scale in measure as Kingfisher Airlines declared that they haven't had a single quarter of profit in their 8-year-long presence in the aviation business and moreover were not in a position to pay the money back to the banks. The state-owned banks were also in worry as they were answerable to shareholders for providing the loans to Mallya even after knowing the problems faced by the company. In early 2011, the bank consortium including SBI had converted debt amounting to Rs 1,400 crore into equity at a 60 percent premium to the prevailing market price. The Enforcement Directorate on Friday also issued a notice and summon to the liquor baron to appear before it on the 18th of March. Along with issuing the summon to Mr.Mallya, the Directorate also issued notice to all 17 banks to provide them with documents and proofs pertaining to Mallya's procurement of loans from them. Mallya left the country on the 2nd of March for the U.K. In one of his recent tweets, he described his travel to the UK as a business visit and called himself an international businessman.

In his own words,

“ I've already been branded as a criminal. I do not feel the time is right. I feel my passions are high. People need to think rationally. I've seen the highest to the lowest points in this matter. But I hope that I return one day. India has given me everything. It made me Vijay Mallya. There was a lookout notice issued against me last year. But I didn't & lsquo escape'. Why am I being portrayed as a criminal now? Loan defaults are a business matter. When the banks give out loans, they know the risk involved. They decide, we don't. Our own business was flourishing but plummeted suddenly. And if people are doubting the integrity of bank employees, then why point the finger at me? I've always taken things on my chin. I've lived grand and helped people do the same. I've never hidden any aspect about my life. I'm one of the most open people. I'm forced to go into hiding and that makes me sick. “

OUR TAKE

The chances of Mallya returning the money he owes to the 17 bank consortium is very less. This is because of a simple fact. H simply does not have the assets to pay the loans back. Let alone the loans, the amount of interest piled up is in itself a Goliath to suppress. Now Kingfisher hardly has any assets left for banks. Even if banks go ahead and sell Kingfisher assets such as the Kingfisher House in Mumbai, the problem will not even be half solved. Mr.Mallya is not the only one to be blamed for this sad occurrence. Even after knowing the company's plight 6 years back, the bank's decision to further refuel Mallya's ambitions can also be put to question once the trials begin.


 

Latest Legal News


Supreme Court’s Verdict on the Same-Sex Marriage; No Fundamental Right to Marry
3 Bills to Renew India's Criminal Justice System presented in Lok Sabha; All you Need to Know
Data Protection Bill Passed by the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha; Decoding the DPDP Bill
High Court; Denying Physical Intimacy to Wife not Cruelty under IPC
PoSH Act Implementation
‘Sorry state of affairs' in PoSH Act implementation; SC orders Govts. to ensure ICCs are constituted
Widow can't inherit Property if Husband did not own it: Punjab & Haryana HC
Widow can't inherit Property if Husband did not own it: Punjab & Haryana HC