Advocate Ravinder Rathi

Questions Answered by Advocate Ravinder Rathi (25+ answers)

Q: Evidence not submitted by advocate before my cross examination

FIR filed against husband and after charge sheet against husband, when I hired my lawyer , I have him all evidence to submit in court for prosecution Evidence since 6 months but till now on 19 august,2025 when my cross examination was done, no evidence submitted by him. What should be done by me? Is he deliberately delaying the case?

Advocate Ravinder Rathi answered
Your lawyer is supposed to assist prosecution by ensuring your documents are placed on record.If he has not filed them despite you giving them, it can weaken your case.If your evidence is not on record when cross-examination happens, it can create contradictions or make your testimony look weak.

Q: property on name of mother have 2 sons & mortgage with bank jointly 1

Their is a property in name of my mother and it was under bank mortgage having joint holder ( my mother as owner & myself as guarantor ) for 26 years. this year my mother passed away with no will writen. we are 2 sons ( 1. myself married with 1 son of 9 months ) 2. unmarried elder .now the elder brother create issue to sold the existing house & get money from them . he was unemployed for 4 years with zero income at all & all the expenses borne by me for household , electricity , taxes , maint

Advocate Ravinder Rathi answered
I have gone through the details of your matter related to the case. For further legal action and personalized assistance, I advise you to get in touch directly with me at the District Court, Loan repayment is mandatory before sale/partition.Since you are guarantor and have been paying EMIs, you can claim reimbursement or adjustment from your brother’s share at the time of partition/sale.

Q: Wife filed 125crpc, now ready for 13b but..

Wife filed 125crpc, now ready for 13b for a certain amt as alimony. We agreed that amt wil b deposited in family court's account and she will get it when she signs divorce papers. She said will withdraw 125crpc on final hearing of 13b, i.e second motion. How quickly can a 125crpc be withdrawn (in 1 day)? Is it possible that she continues 125crpc even after giving divorce? Should I mention in first motion petition that alimony b given only after divorce and withdrawal of 125crpc? Pls advise.

Advocate Ravinder Rathi answered
I have read u r query about the HMA act If she takes alimony but doesn’t withdraw 125 CrPC, she may still press for double benefit (maintenance + lump sum alimony).Divorce decree does not automatically end 125 CrPC case unless settlement is recorded.for further information please contact me.

Q: Suit for declaration for transferring of share

My father and uncle agriculture land in equal share in joint and private property. The land is situated in different four location. A family settlement was done between father and uncle in Bahi Records on 31 July 1999 and division of land describe in the same. I have construction of tubewell in my land and uncle sons have also constructed tubewell to their respective land which was divided as per 'Bahi records'. Now uncle sons are not interested in this division of land and wants share in land

Advocate Ravinder Rathi answered
Your case is essentially a dispute over agricultural land partition where:Land was joint but equal share between your father and uncle.I have gone through the details of your matter related to the Law rato case. For further legal action and personalized assistance, I advise you to get in touch directly with me viva what's app or email .

Q: 35 साल से कब्जे वाली जमीन पर मालिकाना हक लेने के बारे में ।

मेरे पिताजी ने सन् 1989 मे 1 राइस मिल खरीदा था, जिसकी कुल भूमि 25 कनाल के करीब है, लेकिन उस समय हमने जो मिल लिया था, उस समय उसकी कुछ जमीन हमारे नाम होने से रह गई थी, क्योंकि उस समय 6 व्यक्ति नाबालिग थे ओर आज तक सारी जमीन पर हमारा ही कब्ज़ा है ओर उन्होने हमे कोई नोटिस भेजा ।क्या हम कोर्ट के माध्यम से वो जमीन ले सकते हैं

Advocate Ravinder Rathi answered
इतने लंबे समय (लगभग 36 साल) से आपके कब्जे में होने के कारण, मामला Adverse Possession या Limitation Act, 1963 के अंतर्गत भी आपके पक्ष में मजबूत हो सकता है।नाबालिग होने की स्थिति में लिमिटेशन उनकी बालिग होने की तारीख से गिनी जाती है, लेकिन 3 दशकों का कब्जा आपके लिए एक मजबूत डिफेन्स है।for further information please contact me.