LawRato

FABRICATING DOCUMENTS BY IO. AT THE BEHEST OF COMPLAINANT


16-Jan-2023 (In Property Law)
IN A NUTSHELL: Complainant, after the death of her husband, barged into the institution making false allegations that the property documents are forged. Police ignored the complaints of the Victim whereas filed FIR at the behest of Complainant. In addition, Victim was arrested, for not paying bribe, alleging absconding and forgery that too from her place of work. In addition, there is proof that FSL was given several fabricated documents by I/O and Lease Deed admitted by “H” as genuine was hidden by I/O from FSL {although seized from “H” vide seizure memo}. Whereas FSL clearly exonerated Victi, their written report saying: “not able to fix authorship on A”. STATUS: The case is onboard trial court and Ch/sheet filed by IO. In Indira Jaisingh Case, Apex Court had held that investigation can be conducted in on-going court matter. EXPLORED possibility of CBI investigation under Art-32.They advised me to file in H/C u/s 482 and if rejected to revert. Who should be Opp/party
Answers (1)

Answer #1
841 votes
State should be the Opposite Party as de-facto Respondent in Criminal Cases.

Moreover, Direction to re-investigate cannot be given by the Court and lies within the purview of Investigating Agency as per the recent Supreme Court Judgment.
Helpful? LawRato LawRato

Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at lawrato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at lawrato.com to address the specific facts and details.

Report abuse?

Comments by Users

No Comments! Be the first one to comment.

"lawrato.com has handpicked some of the best Legal Experts in the country to help you get practical Legal Advice & help."