×

Simply putting Sindoor and mangalsutra does not validate a marriage under the Hindu marriage act: Bombay HC


  • The court passed the judgment after hearing an appeal filed against an order of the Family Court, Nagpur allowing the petition filed by the 36 year old respondent woman seeking restoration of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The respondent had been married to one Rajesh Deshpande and two children with him. Although they got divorced in 2007, they continued to stay together for the interest of their children. In 2011 she met the appellant and they had a love affair. The appellant then “married” the respondent on April 16, 2012 by putting mangalsutra and applying vermillion on her forehead before the idol of Lord Krishna. Physical relations were established between the two since then.

    None of the appellant’s family members were aware of this “marriage” happening, however once they learnt of this they refused to acknowledge any such marriage. They got their son engaged to another woman in 2013.

    Following this, the respondent got an FIR registered against the appellant under charges of rape and cheating. Appearing for the appellant, Senior Counsel Anand Jaiswal argued that the respondent had threatened his client that if he did not pay Rs.10 lakh to her, she would lodge a complaint of sexual assault against him.

    Hence, in order to save his proposed marriage, the appellant paid a sum of Rs.2 lakh to the respondent. Thereafter the respondent withdrew her complaint filed before the police. SG Joshi, the respondent’s lawyer argued that the marriage between his client and the appellant was performed under the Gandharva system before the idol of lord Krishna. The marriage was never registered.

    Court relied on the respondent’s own views on marriage articulated during cross examination, where she accepted that she had “never seen a marriage where only two rights are performed, i.e. Sindoor and Mangalsutra.” Justice Swapna Joshi, who authored the judgment observed- “As per provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, marriage must be performed as per ceremonies, rites and rituals recognized by either of the parties. Even importance is given to Satpadi in Hindu Marriage. Admittedly, no such ceremonies were performed between the parties.”

    Court then observed that even though there was physical relationship between the two parties, they were not in a live-in relationship, hence there was no valid marriage between the two and the family courts order granting restitution of conjugal rights to the respondent was erroneous has been quashed and set aside. The appeal was allowed.
     

    OUR TAKE

    The court’s decision is reasonable as the appellant and the respondent were not husband and wife even in private lives. They lived apart; the woman lived in her husband's home with her children and husband; the man lived separately. They only met when they wanted physical pleasures. This cannot be called a marriage. Hence the decision of the court is justified.


    Visit the Indian Kanoon section of LawRato to learn more on Indian Laws.

Get free legal advice from top lawyers for your specific issue

Popular Lawyers in India

Advocate Arjun Vinod Bobde

  Supreme Court of India , Delhi
 Experience: 16 years


Advocate Wg Cdr Ajit Kakkar (Retd)

  Dwarka , Delhi
 Experience: 17 years


Advocate Prashant Mendiratta

  Lajpat Nagar 4 , Delhi
 Experience: 24 years


Advocate Prabhjit Jauhar

  Connaught Place , Delhi
 Experience: 20 years


View all >>

How it Works

Know how LawRato makes legal advice easier and effortless

Ask a Free Question

Post a question and get free advice from multiple lawyers

Talk to a Lawyer

Easily find and book private consults with top lawyers in India

Get Fee Estimate

Receive multiple quotations for your legal requirement instantly