Supreme Court to assess PIL on playing the National Anthem in public offices
The Supreme Court, in November 2016, asked all cinemas to play the national anthem before a film is screened “for the love of the motherland”, reigniting a debate over whether an increasingly insistent brand of nationalistic pride is domineering civil liberties.
After making playing of national anthem mandatory in cinema halls before screening of films, the Supreme Court has agreed to assess the feasibility of increasing the scope of its order to include playing the national anthem and song in Parliament, assemblies, public offices, courts and schools on working days.
Senior advocate C U Singh, appearing for Kerala Film Society, pleaded the court to recall its order on mandatory playing of anthem in cinema halls and told the bench that the court should not venture into the realm of legislature. He said it was an essential function of Parliament to frame law and this order of the apex court violated separation of power principle.
The court passed the order on a PIL filed by Delhi BJP spokesperson and advocate Ashwini Upadhyay.
A bench of Justices Dipak Misra, A M Khanwilkar and M M Shantanagoudar issued notice to the Centre requesting its response on a plea for mandatory singing of the national anthem and national song in all public offices. The court also asked the government to respond on framing of a national policy to promote and propagate the national anthem, national song and national flag.
Visit the Indian Kanoon section of LawRato to learn more on Indian Laws.
Get Started >>
Answers by Our Lawyers
- In domestic violence case can relative of husband become party to case
- Two sell deed registered with common part of land what to do
- My Mother would like to create a WILL on my name (I am her daughter)
- Harassment from husband and in-laws. What action can I take?
- How long it will take to get ex-parte divorce