quesWhat are my rights if i was in a relationship for 7 years?

I have been in a relationship of seven years with a guy who committed me for marriage bt all of sudden his cel off and no contact at all by last 15 days.what should i do i dont want to involve my family

  • ansLEGAL STATUS OF LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP

    The definition of live in relationships is not clear and so is the status of the couples in a live in relationship. There is no specific law on the subject of live in relationships in India. There is no legislation to define the rights and obligations of the parties to a live in relationships, the status of children born to such couples. In the absence of any law to define the status of live in relationships, the Courts have come forward to give clarity to the concept of live in relationships.

    The Courts have taken the view that where a man and a woman live together as husband and wife for a long term, the law will presume that they were legally married unless proved contrary.

    The first case in which the Supreme Court of India first recognized the live in relationship as a valid marriage was that of Badri Prasad vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation, in which the Court gave legal validity to the a 50 year live in relationship of a couple.

    The Allahabad High Curt again recognized the concept of live in relationship in the case of Payal Katara vs. Superintendent, Nari Niketan and others, wherein it held that live in relationship is not illegal. The Court said that a man and a woman can live together as per their wish even without getting married. It further said that it may be immoral for the society but is not illegal. Again in the case of Patel and Others., the Supreme Court has held that live in relationship between two adults without marriage cannot be construed as an offence. It further held that there is no law which postulates that live in relationships are illegal. The concept of live in relationship was again recognized in the case of Tulsa v. Durghatiya.

    In the case of S. Khushboo vs. Kanniammal & Anr., the Supreme Court held that living together is a right to life. Live in relationship may be immoral in the eyes of the conservative Indian society but it is not “illegal” in the eyes of law. In this case, all the charges against Kushboo, the south Indian actress who endorsed pre- marital sex and live in relationship were dropped. The Court held that how can it be illegal if two adults live together, in their words “living together cannot be illegal.” However in one of its judgment Alok Kumar vs. State, the Delhi High Court has held that live in relation is walk in and walk out relationship and no strings are attached to it. This kind of relationship does not create any legal bond between the partners. It further held that in case of live in relationships, the partners cannot complain of infidelity or immorality. Again giving recognition to live in relationships, the SupremeCourt in the case of D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal has  held that, a ‘relationship in the nature of marriage’ under the 2005 Act must also fulfill some basic criteria. Merely spending weekends together or a one night stand would not make it a ‘domestic relationship’. It also held that if a man has a ‘keep’ whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a relationship in the nature of marriage’. The court made it clear that if the man has a live-in arrangement with a woman only for sexual reasons, neither partner can claim benefits of a legal marriage. In order to be eligible for ‘palimony’, a relationship must comply with certain conditions, the apex court said.

    The following conditions were laid down by the apex Court:

    1. The couple must hold themselves out to society as being akin to spouses;
    2. They must be of legal age to marry; they must be otherwise qualified to enter into a legal marriage, including being unmarried;

    3. They must have voluntarily cohabited for a significant period of time.

    Conscious of the fact that the judgment would exclude many women in live-in relationships from the benefit of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the apex court said it is not for this court to legislate or amend the law.

    The parliament has used the expression ‘relationship in the nature of marriage’ and not ‘live-in relationship’. The court cannot change the language of the statute.

  • ansIf you wish to initiate legal action then you will have to involve your family, this is the done thing.
    Second, you were involved with him for 7 yrs, so I'm assuming that you had sexual relations with him, if yes, then you can prosecute him for rape, because sexual relationship on the false promise of marriage is rape.

    Advocate Imran Ibrahim

      Sarojini Naidu Marg, Allahabad

  • ansLEGAL STATUS OF LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP
    The definition of live in relationships is not clear and so is
    the status of the couples in a live in relationship. There is no
    specific law on the subject of live in relationships in India.
    There is no legislation to define the rights and obligations of
    the parties to a live in relationships, the status of children
    born to such couples. In the absence of any law to define
    the status of live in relationships, the Courts have come
    forward to give clarity to the concept of live in relationships.
    The Courts have taken the view that where a man and a
    woman live together as husband and wife for a long term,
    the law will presume that they were legally married unless
    proved contrary.
    The first case in which the Supreme Court of India first
    recognized the live in relationship as a valid marriage was
    that of Badri Prasad vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation, in
    which the Court gave legal validity to the a 50 year live in
    relationship of a couple.
    The Allahabad High Curt again recognized the concept of
    live in relationship in the case of Payal Katara vs.
    Superintendent, Nari Niketan and others, wherein it held that
    live in relationship is not illegal. The Court said that a man
    and a woman can live together as per their wish even
    without getting married. It further said that it may be
    immoral for the society but is not illegal.
    Again in the case of Patel and Others., the Supreme Court
    has held that live in relationship between two adults without
    marriage cannot be construed as an offence. It further held
    that there is no law which postulates that live in
    relationships are illegal. The concept of live in relationship
    was again recognized in the case of Tulsa v. Durghatiya.
    In the case of S. Khushboo vs. Kanniammal & Anr., the
    Supreme Court held that living together is a right to life. Live
    in relationship may be immoral in the eyes of the
    conservative Indian society but it is not “illegal” in the eyes
    of law. In this case, all the charges against Kushboo, the
    south Indian actress who endorsed pre- marital sex and live
    in relationship were dropped. The Court held that how can it
    be illegal if two adults live together, in their words “living
    together cannot be illegal.”
    However in one of its judgment Alok Kumar vs. State, the
    Delhi High Court has held that live in relation is walk in and
    walk out relationship and no strings are attached to it. This
    kind of relationship does not create any legal bond between
    the partners. It further held that in case of live in
    relationships, the partners cannot complain of infidelity or
    immorality.
    Again giving recognition to live in relationships, the Supreme
    Court in the case of D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal has
    held that, a ‘relationship in the nature of marriage’ under the
    2005 Act must also fulfill some basic criteria. Merely
    spending weekends together or a one night stand would not
    make it a ‘domestic relationship’. It also held that if a man
    has a ‘keep’ whom he maintains financially and uses mainly
    for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our
    opinion, be a relationship in the nature of marriage’.
    The court made it clear that if the man has a live-in
    arrangement with a woman only for sexual reasons, neither
    partner can claim benefits of a legal marriage. In order to be
    eligible for ‘palimony’, a relationship must comply with
    certain conditions, the apex court said. The following
    conditions were laid down by the apex Court:
    The couple must hold themselves out to society as being
    akin to spouses;
    They must be of legal age to marry; they must be otherwise
    qualified to enter into a legal marriage, including being
    unmarried;
    They must have voluntarily cohabited for a significant
    period of time.
    Conscious of the fact that the judgment would exclude many
    women in live-in relationships from the benefit of the
    Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the apex court said it is not
    for this court to legislate or amend the law. The parliament
    has used the expression ‘relationship in the nature of
    marriage’ and not ‘live-in relationship’. The court cannot
    change the language of the statute.

    Advocate Rajneesh Kumar

      District Court, Saharanpur, Saharanpur

  • Disclaimer: The above query and its response is NOT a legal opinion in any way whatsoever as this is based on the information shared by the person posting the query at LawRato.com and has been responded by one of the Divorce Lawyers at LawRato.com to address the specific facts and details. You may post your specific query based on your facts and details to get a response from one of the Lawyers at LawRato.com or book a Detailed Consultation with a Lawyer of your choice to address your query in detail.
  • Related Articles

Consult best Divorce lawyers in India

Divorce Lawyers

Advocate Jaspreet Singh Rai

  Greater Kailash 1
 Experience: 13 years


Advocate Arjun Vinod Bobde

  Supreme Court of India
 Experience: 13 years


Advocate Diva Arora Menon

  Nizamuddin East
 Experience: 10 years


Advocate Sudershani Ray

  Kailash Hills
 Experience: 9 years


View all >>

How it Works

Know how LawRato makes legal easier and effortless

Ask a Free Question

Post a question and get free advice from multiple lawyers

Talk to a Lawyer

Easily find and book private consults with top lawyers in India

Get Fee Estimate

Receive multiple quotations for your legal requirement instantly