Advocate Rakesh Bahadur Khan

Questions Answered by Advocate Rakesh Bahadur Khan

Q: Wrong dicision of ipc 304 b and 498

The totally wrong dicision given by session court against my family.as the judge has not consider a single evidences.they filed the complain after 2 month, in that period they demanded money, but we had not given.so they filled the complain of 304b and 498.after filling the complain my younger brother sister get anticipatory bail and my brother and parents also get bail after jail of few days.the case was running from last 10 years.as our lawyer completly clerify in hearing and dicussion that alligation of rs 45000 is wrong with lots of reasons. But inspite of that the judge has given all 5 members aajeven karawas. What to do if judge is giving such decision. We already appel in high court. But pl tell me that is it easy to get bail for all. It was the sucide case of hanging of wife.

Advocate Rakesh Bahadur Khan answered
304b and 498a appreciation no complaint was made when the boday of deceased was handed over after post-mortem complaint was lodged after tow month hanging in none of prosecution witnesses was present at the time of incident.demand of 45000/ for is doubt.session court ignored this aspect that the proceedings were instituted maliciously after a delay of tow month an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the appellate.

Q: Clarification on death claim under sec. 163 m.v. act

tractor fall down in Khai and driver died.Where file compensation claim.motor vehicle tribunal or labour court or both.

Advocate Rakesh Bahadur Khan answered
यदि कोई व्यक्ति किसी मोटर वाहन से दरघटना होता है तो उसे पतिकर बीमा कंपनियों मोटर वाहन के सवामि को विधिक वारिसों व पीडित को दुसरी अनुसूचि केअनुसार मुवावजा का सदाय करने के लिए दायि होगा।घारा 163 क अोर घारा 140 में दावा करने वाला व्यक्ति केवल एक ही घारा के अघिनदावा पेश किया जा सकता है ना कि दोनों घाराअो के अधिन।